Care Quality Commission Circular
The following CQC circular was sent to NHS Chief Executives earlier this year in respect of the need to ensure that all x-ray examinations are clinically evaluated. The full letter is provided below:
Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations (IR(ME)R) 2000: Important information on compliance with IR(ME)R
Dear colleague,
We are writing to the chief executives of all NHS trusts in relation to their trust's compliance with IR(ME)R. We have contacted you at this time as it is important for the new intake of trainee doctors arriving in August to understand their role in relation to this issue.
Last year, a radiology department in an NHS trust carried out an internal clinical audit of patients' notes, which showed that around 50% of the radiographs that were provided to referring clinicians for their interpretation had no clinical evaluation report recorded in the patients' notes.
It is a statutory requirement of IR(ME)R that all examinations involving ionising radiation are evaluated in the clinical record, either in the form of a report by a radiologist or an opinion by another clinician. This is a quality issue for the management of patients, as it ensures that all examinations are seen.
The trust has since developed a plan to improve compliance in this area by raising awareness of the requirement, training staff and carrying out a re-audit. While we applaud the trust for undertaking the audit, it has highlighted that the requirement may be difficult to implement in practice.
In relation to IR(ME)R, CQC expects you to:
- Know the degree of compliance with this requirement locally through a clinical audit
- Have agreed initiatives to improve compliance and have a timescale for implementation.
We encourage you to undertake your own audit of how well you comply with the Regulations. However, we recognise that obtaining and searching clinical notes is time-consuming and we certainly don't expect you to monitor compliance continuously.
If we inspect your trust's radiology department in our 2011 programme, it would help to assure us if you could refer to an audit of notes, indicating what percentage of exposures had been evaluated. We would also expect you to plan how to improve this percentage. You may find it useful when planning your workforce to distinguish whether examinations were reported by radiologists, radiographers or non-radiologist medical practitioners.
Please ensure that you forward this important information to the relevant team in your trust, as it is essential that they are aware of their requirements under the Regulations.
For more information please visit our website. If you have any queries, please email them directly to IRMER@cqc.org.uk and we will respond accordingly.
Yours faithfully,
Dr Nick Bishop, Senior Medical Advisor - Care Quality Commission
Cliff Double Lead IR(ME)R Inspector - Care Quality Commission
Back to the top
|